|
Post by Coasterdude5 on May 19, 2007 16:43:14 GMT -5
Which one would you rather have?
If you can take the forces, would you rather have the forces, or like me, who would rather to be able to ride something over and over without getting a headache or something.
Post your thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by kennywood007 on May 19, 2007 18:37:05 GMT -5
Forceless can be more thrilling, and more enjoyable.
This is a hard one.....
Forceful can also be enjoyable, but not re-ridable. If it's to forceful you can get headaches and stuff from riding so much.
I would probably pick Forceful though, because I have a high tolerance when it comes to rough, or "forceful" rides.
|
|
|
Post by IamtheInterpol on May 19, 2007 19:30:22 GMT -5
I'd rather have it be forceless like Nitro, that extremely forceful like Batman: The Ride where I blacked out twice in the back row.
|
|
|
Post by coasterfreak101 on May 20, 2007 19:54:54 GMT -5
Forceful!
I don't black out or anything, and I would totally do Montu's batwing element over and over and over again!
|
|
kennywood_racer
Well Known
Phantom Phantatic
Phantom Fright Nights
Posts: 366
|
Post by kennywood_racer on May 21, 2007 6:47:39 GMT -5
I once rode the Thunderbolt 8 times in 2 hrs. OUTSIDE SEAT Too!. Dose that count for anythig?
That is a hard one. I can ride anything over and over again, execpt the old Steel Phantom. Thats the only one I would ever say was two forcefull for me.
|
|
|
Post by FeelTheFORCE on May 21, 2007 20:44:21 GMT -5
I prefer forceful. I can definitely handle it and just like it better.
|
|
|
Post by mattjackson on Jun 20, 2007 18:25:18 GMT -5
I prefer forceless, since the parks that are in my park range (SFGAd, MP, and DP) pretty much all have a collective majority of "weak rides". There are a few "crushers" there, though.
|
|
|
Post by Coasterdude5 on Jun 20, 2007 23:24:29 GMT -5
After riding Tennessee Tornado three times... Forceful is back in my books. Heck yes.
|
|
|
Post by DeWalt Racing on Jun 21, 2007 9:52:02 GMT -5
Forceful, hands down.
A rollercoaster would not be fun without feeling it.
|
|
|
Post by coasterfreak101 on Jun 21, 2007 21:51:25 GMT -5
Just rode Darien Lake's Boomerang yesterday - 5.2 G's in the back seat, and I could've done it over and over again
|
|
|
Post by deaconnor on Jun 28, 2007 12:37:43 GMT -5
Forceful! Batman rules!!!
|
|
|
Post by phazan on Jun 28, 2007 14:57:30 GMT -5
I love forcefull coasters, but they give me head aches, so it almost cancels it out. I do still like non-forcefull coasters though. Goliath at SFMM isn't really that forcefull, (except for the helix of death!!) but I still love how fast it goes, and it still makes for a really fun ride.
|
|
|
Post by wdwfanatic on Jun 30, 2007 22:14:50 GMT -5
Forceful. I can't ride extreme positively forced coasters over and over, but I can with negatively forced ones
|
|
|
Post by phazan on Jun 30, 2007 23:03:28 GMT -5
^Roller coasters rarely pull a lot of negative Gs...a lot of people think they do, but really, just negative one G would be pretty intense. I mean...that would be strong enough to make your arm fly up as fast as it falls down..I have yet to ride a coaster with airtime stronger than negative one g.
|
|
|
Post by coasterfreak101 on Jul 1, 2007 19:33:05 GMT -5
I think that "Negative G" is usually used to describe G's lower than +1. They might not be true negatives, but they're less than the normal amount, which is probably why they're referred to as "Negative." I refer to them as negatives, even though they aren't actual negatives
|
|